BARACK OBAMA IS NOT GOING TO GET INVOLVED WITH THIS EMERGENCY, AND THAT’S A GOOD THING

I know what you’ve been feeling. The president should do something about this oil spill. He should personally take charge of the capping effort. You imagine Barack Obama on a Naval destroyer. His one hand grasping the rigging, leaning past the bow of the ship, his other hand shading his eyes, as he scans the watery horizon for any sign of the source of the oil. When the ship finally arrives at the epicenter of the disaster, the President has already stripped down to a bathing suit, in preparation for what everyone knows he must do. Executing a perfect swan dive, he plunges into the thick black whirlpool, a large shark knife clenched between his teeth.

Ok, maybe that’s not what you are imagining. I don’t know. You are going to have to work out all that homoerotic fantasizing yourself. I can’t help you. Either way, you need to accept the idea that Barack Obama is not going to get involved with this emergency, and contrary to what you’re feeling, that’s probably a good thing.


I say this as a result of two facts. First, in 1979 a similar drilling accident occurred off the coast of Mexico and they tried everything we are trying now (high hats, top kill, rubber tires, the whole enchilada) in an attempt to stop the leak. In spite of all their efforts, the geyser was not capped until a relief well was drilled TEN MONTHS later. And that whole exercise occurred in only 160 feet of water. This current spill is happening one mile under the ocean. There really is little hope that this will end any time soon. So we must resign ourselves to the fact that there is no minimization of damages here. There is only recovery, years and years of recovery.

And the second fact is that these years of recovery are going to cost billions. So who is going to pay those billions? No question, BP, right? Of course. But what if Obama takes control of the capping effort? Then what? What if, say, he had ordered crews to use the top kill first, then the top hat, (the opposite of what BP did)? What then? Probably the same results - failure. And the relief well would still have to be drilled.

Only there really would be a big difference. British Petroleum wouldn’t be responsible for all the failures, Barack Obama would. And BP would have an argument in court. “Why should we pay the entire cost of the cleanup,” they would say. “It’s partially also the presidents fault. After all he authorized the top kill before the high hat. That was a mistake. If we, BP, were in charge, it would have been done differently. We would have had that well capped in half the time. As a result, your honor, we, at BP, feel we should only have to pay for half of the cleanup.” And you know that’s what they would say.

Even if the President did exactly what BP is doing now, in exactly the same order - it wouldn’t matter. BP would say, they’d of done it differently. That’s what any corporation would say. There is nothing wrong with that. There job is to make money. (or stop from paying for pesky things like cleanups) But we can’t give BP any excuses.

You see, we have to continue to allow BP to be completely in charge. They must be completely responsible. We have no alternative, unless we, the American people want to be on the hook for some portion of what will inevitably be billions upon billions of dollars for cleanup. Unfortunately, until the well is capped, we are all BP’s bitches. Now, once the well is capped, that’s a different story. Then, hopefully, we can kick some ass. (There I go, dreaming again)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“Ok, then it’s agreed. We can build a rocket and all get the hell out of here before any of the problems start.”

Image
Each of the people in this picture has accomplished more for humanity then any of the guys in that other painting. From left to right they are: Galileo Galilei – Physicist, Mathematician, Astronomer Extraordinaire, and Champion of the Copernican Theory, through which man gets a clear view of where he or she stands in the universe. Using observations of the moons of Jupiter and phases of Venus, Galileo offered evidence that the Earth revolved around the Sun. He was the first to observe sun spots, the rings of Saturn, and mountains on the moon. Steven Hawking said, "Galileo, perhaps more than any other single person, was responsible for the birth of modern science." It wasn’t until 1992 that Pope John Paul II admitted that the church’s ruling against Galileo might have been a mistake. Marie Skłodowska Curie – Physicist, Chemist, she was the first person honored with 2 Nobel Prizes; one for her pioneering work in the field of radioactivity, the other in chemistry. She create
Read more

DRUNKEN DOWSING

Image
Well, I found myself at yet another party, with too much wine in me. There I was with five others arguing about the paranormal. As is generally the case, I alone was defending Science and Skepticism against assaults from all sides. I wasn ’t doing very well. My losses were completely due to the amount of alcohol that I had consumed and in no way related to my position, which I assure you was rock solid. Or at least that’s how I remember it. Although the next morning I woke up with a terrible headache and my socks were missing. Sensing vulnerability, one of my friends decided to attack on another front by reminding me that he is an accomplished dowser. They all know exactly where my buttons are and have no qualms in pushing them liberally. The long and short of it is I have a challenge. I must come up with an experiment to test my friend’s abilities. I will try to document this experiment and keep you posted as to how it is progressing. The following is the first email exchange: (ME) So
Read more

THE DUNNING KRUGER EFFECT - people are to stupid to know they are stupid

Image
Have you ever sat and listened to a person drone on about a subject they know nothing about? This week’s Fallacy is so easy, it’s stupid. It’s also the one that is the hardest to accept in ourselves. It’s called THE DUNNING KRUGER EFFECT. It’s based on research done at Cornell University that showed that the less competent  someone is on a subject,  the worse they are at assessing their level of  in competence  in that subject.   The reverse is also true.  The more competent a person is, in a subject, the less competent they tend to judge themselves to be. Author, Charles Bukowski   puts it best, “ The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.”  With that in mind, I would like to state, here and now, for the record, that I never know what I am talking about (wait  a second, is that a humblebrag?)
Read more